From Thesis to Opportunity: A Practical Guide to Industrial Real Estate Investment Analysis
Deal Flow
Data
The Career Risk of Missed Opportunities
In industrial real estate, the most successful operators share a common concern: "Of all the deals we screened, did we miss one that a competitor closed profitably?"
This isn't just about speed or efficiency—it's about the risk of passing on the kind of deal that defines careers. For small-to-mid market firms, which often underwrite 10 to 50+ deals per year with limited team capacity, that risk is real.
Traditional underwriting tools tend to focus on automating tasks. But the bottleneck isn't just manual work—it's the opportunity blind spot. What separates good from great is a repeatable system for identifying and prioritizing the deals that actually fit your investment DNA.
This guide offers a step-by-step framework for doing just that. Using a real case study rooted in the approach of Alere Property Group, we'll walk through how to construct a clear investment thesis, apply it systematically to surface higher-quality deals, evaluate opportunities through a rigorous lens, and avoid common traps that lead to false positives—including one property that appears attractive but fails critical thesis tests.
Step 1: Thesis Construction - Building Your Investment DNA
Every strong investment process starts with clarity. Before you underwrite a single deal, you need a well-defined thesis that aligns your sourcing, evaluation, and execution strategies.
Alere's Framework
Alere Property Group, one of the most sophisticated operators in the industrial space, uses a clear and focused thesis:
"Create long-term value through strategic investment in best-in-class industrial facilities positioned in infill markets critical to Southern California logistics ."
A strong thesis like this is more than just words—it becomes a system. We’re able to break down the investment criteria on Alere’s website into measurable, repeatable filters, it can guide sourcing, screening, and diligence across four key dimensions:
Location
Infill Market Positioning: Supply-constrained submarkets with >80% build-out
Port Proximity: Within 50 miles of San Pedro Bay Port Complex
Highway Access: Direct access to major freight corridors (I-5, I-10, I-405, I-710)
Labor Market Access: Within 30 minutes of 500K+ population centers
Market Attributes
Institutional Tenant Base: Target tenants with $1B+ revenue
E-commerce Growth Exposure: Markets with 15%+ annual e-commerce growth
Supply Constraints: <5% new supply pipeline relative to existing stock
Property Attributes
Scale: 25,000 to 1M+ SF facilities
Specifications: 36-40 foot clear heights, cross-dock configuration
Functional Design: Modern distribution and manufacturing capability
Expansion Potential: Adjacent developable land or building expansion rights
Financial Attributes
Yield Targets: 6-8% stabilized cap rates
Value-Add Potential: 200-400 basis point IRR enhancement opportunity
Tenant Credit: Investment-grade or equivalent credit tenants
Why This Framework Works
Each attribute serves as both a screening criterion and a value driver. When you find properties that check multiple boxes, you're not just finding deals—you're finding deals that align with proven value creation strategies.
Step 2: Application - From Theory to Deal Flow
A thesis is only valuable if it guides your actions. With a structured framework, you can now apply real filters to your deal flow instead of scanning every deal on the market:
Systematic Opportunity Sourcing
Geographic Focus: Los Angeles County, Orange County, Inland Empire, SF Bay Area
Property Type Filters: Distribution centers, cross-dock facilities, manufacturing
Size Parameters: 25,000+ SF with expansion potential
Market Condition Screening: Infill markets with supply constraints
This approach recently surfaced three properties that perfectly demonstrate the framework's power—two compelling opportunities and one cautionary example that shows why systematic screening . That’s what Alpha Deal was built for.
Step 3: Opportunity Analysis - Three Case Studies
With a structured thesis in hand, you can evaluate deals quickly and consistently. The following case studies show how to apply the framework in practice—and how it helps you spot both great opportunities and avoid costly mistakes.
✅ Opportunity #1: Rialto Distribution Campus
Location: Rialto, CA (Inland Empire) Size: Large-scale distribution facility Key Attributes: Modern specifications, Inland Empire location
Framework Application:
✅ Location Scoring
Infill Position: Rialto sits in the heart of the Inland Empire's established logistics corridor
Port Access: ~60 miles from San Pedro Bay (acceptable for IE positioning)
Highway Network: Direct access to I-10, I-210, and connecting routes to I-15/I-215
Labor Market: San Bernardino-Riverside MSA provides deep logistics labor pool
✅ Market Dynamics
Tenant Demand: IE remains the primary overflow market for LA/OC logistics needs
Supply Constraints: Land costs and regulatory hurdles limit new development
Growth Drivers: Continued e-commerce expansion driving warehouse demand
⚠️ Key Diligence Areas
Tenant Quality: Verify current tenant credit and lease terms
Traffic Patterns: Analyze truck routing and local traffic management
Expansion Rights: Confirm adjacent land availability and zoning
Verdict: Passes all filters → Proceed to diligence.
✅ Opportunity #2: 100 W Alondra Boulevard, Carson
Location: Carson, CA (South Bay - Los Angeles County) Size: Industrial facility in prime infill location Key Attributes: Carson infill positioning, port proximity
Framework Application:
✅ Location Scoring (Premium)
Infill Position: Carson represents true infill with minimal developable alternatives
Port Access: <20 miles from both LA and Long Beach ports (exceptional)
Highway Network: Intersection of 405, 110, 710, 91 freeways (premium connectivity)
Labor Market: Access to entire LA Basin workforce
✅ Market Dynamics (Strong)
Tenant Demand: Tier-1 market with institutional tenant focus
Supply Constraints: Carson has virtually no large development sites remaining
Rental Growth: South Bay seeing consistent rent appreciation
⚠️ Key Diligence Areas
Environmental: Carson's industrial history requires thorough Phase I/II analysis
Truck Access: Verify routing compliance with local restrictions
Competitive Position: Analyze against other available Carson facilities
Verdict: Strong infill positioning → Proceed to diligence.
❌ Opportunity #3: 53,420 SF Industrial Facility, Vernon
Location: Vernon, CA (Southeast Los Angeles) Size: 53,420 SF with 14-foot clear height Key Attributes: Large size, Vernon location, freeway access, heavy power (1,200 amps)
Framework Application:
✅ Location Scoring (Solid)
Infill Position: Vernon is established industrial enclave with limited new development
Port Access: ~15 miles from San Pedro Bay Ports (meets proximity requirements)
Highway Network: Access to I-5 and I-10 freeways (good connectivity)
Labor Market: Access to entire LA Basin workforce
✅ Market Dynamics (Strong)
Tenant Demand: Vernon has institutional tenant presence and industrial focus
Supply Constraints: Limited developable land in Vernon maintains scarcity value
Growth Drivers: Established logistics and manufacturing hub
❌ Property Attributes (Critical Failures)
Scale: 53,420 SF meets minimum size requirements ✓
Specifications: 14-foot clear height significantly below 36-40 foot target ❌
Functional Design: Only 6 dock doors for 53K+ SF = poor dock ratio ❌
Building Vintage: 1951 construction suggests potential infrastructure limitations
🔍 Why This Property Appears Attractive
Size & Location: Large facility in proven industrial market
Heavy Power: 1,200 amp capacity suggests manufacturing capability
Office Component: 6,933 SF office space (13% of total) for operations
Security: Fully fenced with gated access
Vernon Advantages: Industrial zoning, business-friendly environment
⚠️ Critical Failure Points
Ceiling Height: 14-foot clear height eliminates modern distribution tenants requiring 36-40 feet
Dock Configuration: 6 dock doors for 53K SF = 1 dock per 8,900 SF (modern standard: 1 per 5,000-7,000 SF)
Functional Obsolescence: 1951 construction may have structural limitations for modern logistics
Tenant Pool: Height restrictions limit to manufacturing/storage vs. high-value distribution tenants
🎯 Deal Intelligence Value
This represents the most dangerous type of missed analysis—a property that checks location and size boxes but fails critical operational requirements. Traditional screening might approve based on Vernon location, size over 25,000 SF, port proximity, and heavy power.
But systematic deal intelligence would immediately flag specification mismatches, tenant analysis questions, comparable performance concerns, and exit risk factors.
The Key Insight: Surface metrics (size, location, power) can mask fundamental operational failures. This property would likely trade at a discount to reflect its functional limitations, but an uninformed buyer might mistake the discount for opportunity rather than recognizing the structural constraints.
Verdict: PASS - Fails critical property specifications despite strong location fundamentals
Step 4: Critical Due Diligence Framework
Passing the thesis test isn't the finish line—it's the starting point for rigorous due diligence. Even after thesis fit, great deals require real-world validation.
Priority 1: Location Validation
For both qualifying properties, the location thesis needs rigorous validation:
Traffic & Access Analysis
Commission traffic studies during peak hours
Map actual truck routes vs. theoretical access
Verify compliance with local truck route restrictions
Analyze impact of any planned infrastructure changes
Competitive Landscape
Survey all comparable facilities within 5-mile radius
Analyze historical absorption rates and rental trends
Identify upcoming supply additions or major tenant moves
Map key tenant locations and logistics requirements
Priority 2: Physical Asset Verification
Modern industrial users have specific requirements that directly impact value:
Specifications Audit
Verify actual clear heights (not just stated)
Test dock door functionality and truck maneuvering space
Assess power capacity and distribution infrastructure
Evaluate HVAC, fire safety, and security systems
Expansion Analysis
Survey adjacent land availability and zoning
Analyze expansion costs vs. building new elsewhere
Review building permits and development timeline feasibility
Model expansion economics and tenant demand
Priority 3: Market Position Assessment
Understanding competitive dynamics determines pricing power:
Tenant Analysis
Deep dive on current tenant financial health
Analyze lease terms, escalations, and renewal probability
Research tenant's broader real estate strategy
Identify backup tenant prospects and market rates
Value-Add Potential
Quantify specific improvement opportunities
Model ROI on capital investments (dock doors, clear height, automation)
Analyze rent growth potential post-improvements
Assess repositioning timeline and risk factors
Step 5: Decision Framework - Go/No-Go Criteria
You can't pursue every deal. A clear decision framework helps your team move decisively—whether that means greenlighting the next step or confidently walking away.
Minimum Threshold Requirements
All properties must meet these non-negotiable criteria:
Location: Pass 4/5 location screening questions
Market: Demonstrate 5%+ rental growth potential over 3 years
Property: Meet minimum size and specification requirements
Financial: Achieve target returns in base case scenarios
Systematic Intelligence Scoring
For deals that meet the baseline, prioritize by:
Competitive Moat: How defensible is the location advantage?
Execution Risk: Which deal has a clearer path to value creation?
Market Timing: Which submarket has better current dynamics?
Scale Efficiency: Which property offers better operational leverage?
Conclusion: From Deal Intelligence to Competitive Advantage
Great deals don't just appear—they're surfaced by teams that build systems to recognize them faster, and walk away from the rest.
The Vernon case is the perfect example. On paper, it looks solid: port proximity, power, infill location. But without height and dock functionality, it's fundamentally mismatched with target tenants.
The power of systematic thesis construction isn't just in finding deals—it's in not missing the deals you should have bought. Without a systematic framework, attractive surface metrics could easily mask fundamental operational failures that make properties unsuitable for target tenants.
Beyond Speed: The Intelligence Advantage
Most tools speed up underwriting. Few help you detect opportunities—or blind spots.
Short-Term Value Creation:
Deal Outcome Tracking: Monitor which passed deals closed profitably vs. your acquisitions
Assumption Validation: Learn which underwriting assumptions prove accurate over time
Competitive Intelligence: Understand which operators consistently win deals you evaluate
Blind Spot Analysis: Identify patterns in deals you're not seeing or considering
Long-Term Strategic Value:
Market Intelligence: Aggregate deal flow patterns reveal market timing opportunities
Predictive Models: Learn which deal characteristics predict success by market/operator type
Network Effects: Cross-market intelligence improves assumptions for all users
Career Risk Mitigation: Systematic approach ensures no profitable opportunity slips through
Final Word: This Isn't About Efficiency—It's About Edge
The most successful real estate investors don't just find good deals—they build systems that make it hard to miss great ones. Alpha Deal isn't just helping firms move faster. We're helping them move smarter—with frameworks that surface conviction-worthy opportunities and help teams focus where it counts.
Ready to eliminate the career risk of missed opportunities? Systematic deal intelligence transforms thesis construction from manual process into competitive advantage.
Methodology Note: Property data for this analysis was sourced from publicly available commercial real estate listings and property records. Investment criteria and thesis framework are derived from publicly available sources including company websites and disclosed investment strategies. The framework represents a composite methodology based on established institutional real estate investment practices, with specific attributes tailored to demonstrate systematic deal analysis principles. All financial targets and screening criteria are illustrative examples designed to show framework application rather than specific investment recommendations.
Alpha Deal is a product designed to extract and summarize information regarding actual or potential real estate investments based on user provided inputs.
Alpha Deal does not make any recommendation to buy, sell or hold any investment in any company or real estate asset, and does not speculate upon the value of any securities. The information presented by Alpha Deal is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial, investment or legal advice. Alpha Deal does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness or suitability of any information presented. All investments involve risks, including the potential loss of principal. In no event shall Alpha Deal be liable for any damages, costs, expenses, legal fees or losses in connection with the use of or reliance upon any such information.